[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: documentating the recent -fwrapv discussion
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: documentating the recent -fwrapv discussion |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:30:46 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
This is good documentation. I see one typo:
> +Despite this requirement by the standard, it has long been common for C
> +code to assume wraparound arithmetic after signed overflow, and all
> +known practical C implementations support some C idioms that assume
> +wraparound signed arithmetic, even if the idioms does not conform
"...idioms does not..." => "...idioms do not..."
> +strictly to the standard. If your code looks like the following
> +examples it will almost surely work with real-world compilers.
--
"Ho ho ho. I _so_ enjoy making a fool out of myself."
--Linus, on Christmas Day, 2000