[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: some issues in the latest Autoconf
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: some issues in the latest Autoconf |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Oct 2007 07:56:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hello Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:33:53PM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I'm wondering whether it's the goal to release as soon as the license
> > issues are resolved, how far that may be away, whether more experimental
> > features should be put on a git branch first. Comments appreciated.
>
> Can you please remind us what those license issues are? A pointer to
> lists.gnu.org would suffice.
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2007-08/msg00007.html>
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2007-09/msg00000.html>
Some message on gnu-prog discusses this, too, and mentions why it's
taking them longer than expected.
> I'm a fan of releasing soon.
Sure; I'd prefer a short calm-down period of intensified testing though.
;-)
> I don't see why license issues should get in the way. We can release
> with GPLv3, no?
AFAICS the FSF would like us to have the exception language adjusted to
match GPLv3 first.
Cheers,
Ralf