[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH RFA: Add support for Go programming language
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH RFA: Add support for Go programming language |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:15:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
* Eric Blake wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 06:42:54PM CET:
> On 11/03/2010 11:38 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> >> It otherwise seems low-danger to me, but
> >> I wouldn't want to move forward on the Libtool sister patch without this
> >> one cleared.
> >
> > I'm at the point with my gcc patches where I kind of need an answer to
> > this question. The question is: what name should we use in shell and
> > make to refer to the Go compiler? I've been using GCCGO. Should we
> > instead use GOC or GOCC or something else? How can we decide this?
>
> Personally, I'd like GOC mnemonic of Go-compiler (to match FC for
> Fortran-compiler, or CC for C compiler).
GOC is used now in the Libtool patch for Go support (which has a
replacement macro for AC_PROG_GO if that is not defined).
Cheers,
Ralf
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: PATCH RFA: Add support for Go programming language,
Ralf Wildenhues <=