[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: [bug-gnulib] Missing space after shebang, or autoconf doc error?
From: |
Keith Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: Fw: [bug-gnulib] Missing space after shebang, or autoconf doc error? |
Date: |
Fri, 20 May 2005 23:22:52 +0100 |
Hi Werner,
On Thursday 19 May 2005 1:03 pm, you wrote:
> This will interest you.
>
> > According to the autoconf info files
> > this might cause problems on some old platforms.
>
> As far as I know, that's incorrect information promulgated originally by
> Greg what's-his-name, many years ago. It's come up many times since and
> no one has ever come up with an actual platform on which it is a
> problem, to my knowledge. Certainly none that still exist today, in any
> case.
>
> I thought it had been eradicated from the autoconf docs some years ago.
> Oh well.
>
> but I think it is a good idea to make
> all shebangs in the various scripts look similar.
>
> If someone wants to take the time to change it, that's ok with me, but I
> don't think it's necessary.
Ok. Thanks for the update. I hadn't been aware of it as a problem myself.
I simply noticed the recommendation in the autoconf info files, and realised
that groff has a number of scripts which didn't conform, so, in my groff CVS
sandbox, I did
for f in `grep -lr '#!/' .`
do
sed 's?#!/?#! /?' $f > xx && mv xx $f
done
cvs -z5 diff -u | gzip > patchfile.gz
to create the patch, and a similar trick to generate most of the ChangeLog
entry, so I didn't waste much time on it.
If it isn't really a problem, then it's no big deal if you want to revert the
patch, or leave it as it is now -- everything should work fine either way.
However, the misleading advice, if indeed it is so, really should be expunged
from the autoconf documentation, IMHO.
Best regards,
Keith.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Fw: [bug-gnulib] Missing space after shebang, or autoconf doc error?,
Keith Marshall <=