automake-ng
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Automake-NG] [PATCH 02/26] [ng] texi: tweak rules for HTML generati


From: Stefano Lattarini
Subject: Re: [Automake-NG] [PATCH 02/26] [ng] texi: tweak rules for HTML generation to spawn only one shell
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:35:07 +0200

On 06/17/2012 09:58 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
> 
> Le 17 juin 2012 à 09:41, Stefano Lattarini a écrit :
> 
>>> Why such an extension?
>>>
>> It was already in the pre-existing code.
> 
> Yes, I know.
> 
>>  And about the reason it was there,
>> I guess it was to cater to systems with 8+3 filenames (e.g., DJGPP on DOS),
> 
> I guessed too :)
> 
>> where one can't have file names with "two or more extensions" (like
>> 'config.h.in' or, in this case, foo.html.tmp).
>>
>>> address@hidden looks more readable.
>>>
>> Or ever 'address@hidden', for consistency with other rules.
>
s/ever/even/ here, sorry.

> I don't like this use of -t instead of an extension such as .tmp, but
> I don't care much.
>
Neither do I honestly; we'll just have to pick one idiom and stick to it :-)

>>  But I guess such changes
>> are better done in a later refactoring, to rationalize the names/location of
>> temporary files.  WDYS?
> 
> Yes, of course.  I was commenting the code more than the patch per se,
> but I do mean to suggest changes.
>
OK then, such suggestions are always welcome (even though most of the
times I won't act on them right away).

>>
>>>>    then \
>>>>      rm -rf $@; \
>>>> ## Work around a bug in Texinfo 4.1 (-o foo.html outputs files in foo/
> 
> BTW, looks like something we can get rid of.
>
Yes, but that's something I want to do for Automake 1.13 as well (see also
the "Future backward-incompatibilities" entries in Automake 1.12 NEWS file);
so I plan to make the change there first, and transport in Automake-NG once
we merge back the master branch.

Thanks,
  Stefano



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]