[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 62-variable-pretty-output.patch
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: 62-variable-pretty-output.patch |
Date: |
07 Apr 2001 18:24:16 -0600 |
>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:
Akim> There is one test that fails with this patch, but I leave it on
Akim> purpose, because there is a choice to make: is it Makefile.in
Akim> that should be pretty, or is it Makefile?
Neither has to be pretty!
Akim> Hence my question: should we neglect the length of the
Akim> conditions because we consider filling when they are
Akim> AC_SUBST'ed, or we should consider their length before
Akim> substitution for filling?
Really it doesn't matter much to me.
Akim> * automake.in (&variable_output): Admit a list of @CONDS.
Akim> (&variable_pretty_output): New.
Akim> (&define_pretty_variable): Use it.
Akim> (&read_am_file, &file_contents_internal): Prepend a separator to
Akim> $am_vars only if there is none yet.
Akim> (&file_contents_internal): Rename $separator as $spacing to
Akim> harmonize with &read_am_file.
Ok.
Tom
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: 62-variable-pretty-output.patch,
Tom Tromey <=