[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: License of Class::Struct
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: License of Class::Struct |
Date: |
12 Apr 2001 16:18:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
Hi Elaine!
It's good to finally have news about this issue!
| Akim Demaille address@hidden quoth:
| *>Jarkko, I include below a news I tried to send on comp.lang.perl, but
| *>I think it never went out of my organization.
|
| comp.lang.perl split off into comp.lang.perl.misc, .modules, .moderated
| and .tk a while back. Check your newsfeed provider to see if they carry
| them.
Aaaaaarg! Does it mean comp.lang.perl is really dead and should not
exist? I can see it from here, but its sole content is the news I
sent a week ago :)
| *>In other words, does the GPL also applies to modules?
|
| Yes. With rare exception, the Perl distribution is covered by both the
| Artistic License or the GPL, whichever is more appropriate for your needs
| and it doesn't sound like you would be in conflict with either of them.
Would it be possible that someone include a few words about this in
Class::Struct? I would feel much more comfortable with that.
In fact, I'm a bit worried by your words: you said
_With rare exception_, the Perl distribution is covered by
both the Artistic License or the GPL
I would like to have read
_Unless stated otherwise_, the Perl distribution is covered by
both the Artistic License or the GPL
:)
Tom, is this enough for us to use it?
- Re: License of Class::Struct,
Akim Demaille <=