[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem: multiple definitions
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: problem: multiple definitions |
Date: |
12 Apr 2001 17:54:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
| I had the same problem, when I used the LDFLAGS in Makefile.am
| Running automake I get the same mystrious message.
|
| src/foo/Makefile.am:6: LDFLAGS multiply defined in condition TRUE
| LDFLAGS (User, where = 6) =
| {
|
| TRUE => -export-dynamic
| }
This was a bug.
| I found a solution by adding the library or program name to the LDFLAGS the
message vanished.
|
| lib_LTLIBRARIES = libfoo.la
| LDFLAGS = -export-dynamic
|
| has to change to
|
| lib_LTLIBRARIES = libfoo.la
| libfoo_la_LDFLAGS = -export-dynamic
This was a workaround, i.e., there was no intention to have you do
this. The normal behavior is now reestablished, sorry for the
inconvenience.
Akim
- problem: uninstall-am in makefile with no install targets and non-GNU make., Robert Collins, 2001/04/11
- Re: problem: uninstall-am in makefile with no install targets and non-GNU make., Akim Demaille, 2001/04/11
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/11
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/17
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/17
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/17
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/18
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/04/18
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/18
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Robert Collins, 2001/04/18
- Re: problem: unitialized +=, Akim Demaille, 2001/04/18