[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future plans for Autotools
From: |
Kip Warner |
Subject: |
Re: Future plans for Autotools |
Date: |
Mon, 03 May 2021 17:30:43 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.1-1 |
On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 17:49 +0000, FOURNIER Yvan wrote:
> - When using Gettext, "make update-po" modifies code in the source
> tree based on a command in the build tree. When using separate source
> and build trees, this is somewhat surprising, so having an equivalent
> command (not based on the generated Makefiles) for the source tree
> would be more consistent as regards source/build separation.
Yes, I agree this is a weird one for the reason stated.
On a related note, and correct me if I'm wrong, but automake doesn't
automatically generate that target. You still have to implement it
yourself?
--
Kip Warner -- Senior Software Engineer
OpenPGP signed/encrypted mail preferred
https://www.thevertigo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, FOURNIER Yvan, 2021/05/02
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Thomas Jahns, 2021/05/03
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, NightStrike, 2021/05/05
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Karl Berry, 2021/05/06
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Bob Friesenhahn, 2021/05/06
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, NightStrike, 2021/05/06
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Andy Tai, 2021/05/06
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Bob Friesenhahn, 2021/05/06
Re: Future plans for Autotools,
Kip Warner <=
Re: Future plans for Autotools, Karl Berry, 2021/05/12