[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly
From: |
Loveny Design |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:38:43 +1100 |
The value 477 is approx 5% low, which is within spec for the internal
reference. I think your expectations for the ADC are an order of magnitude
too high ;-)
As for your other problem, it is usual for analogue circuits to be given a
few seconds (or even minutes) to reach thermal equilibrium... which is
possibly the cause of that observation.
Regards,
Jon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of Douglas Dotson
> Sent: Monday, 16 February 2004 8:03 AM
> To: Douglas Dotson; Richard Urwin; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly
>
>
> Things just got even stranger. I measured the
> 1.22v internal reference on channel 31. Measures
> low by 22 counts. Reads 477, should be 499. I'm
> starting to question the usefullness of this ADC
> as 10 bits.
>
> Doug
>
- [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/14
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Mattias Svensson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Richard Urwin, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly,
Loveny Design <=
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Richard Urwin, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Richard Urwin, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Richard Urwin, 2004/02/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Mattias Svensson, 2004/02/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, t.white, 2004/02/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Richard Urwin, 2004/02/17