|
From: | Bruce D. Lightner |
Subject: | Re: [avr-gcc-list] Gcc branches small comparison. |
Date: | Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:31:39 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) |
Dmitry K. wrote:
Hi all. Functions are from avr-libc-1.2.0, without ones too small or asm. (`*-new' are from patches). Results are in form: prog_words + stack_bytes -mmcu=atmega8 -Os -frename-registers 3.2.3 3.3.5 3.4.3 4.0 4.0-nrr bsearch 69+12 68+12 67+12 66+12 66+12 bsearch-new 70+12 70+12 69+12 76+14 76+14 malloc 164+2 152+0 156+2 158+2 158+2 free 99+2 92+2 92+2 86+2 86+2 qsort 464+22 450+22 450+22 412+22 412+22 do_random 102+14 91+10 93+10 173+14 173+14 realloc 240+12 230+12 228+12 233+14 234+14 strtol 308+36 291+36 295+36 318+36 312+36 strtol-new 286+16 276+16 281+16 297+17 297+17 strtoul 277+29 260+29 261+29 278+27 278+27 strtoul-new 278+16 265+16 264+16 317+21 317+21 vfprintf 672+36 652+36 626+36 694+37 694+37 vfscanf 655+24 637+24 601+24 725+39 726+39 Notes: * Stack usage -- without nested calls. * 4.0 is 20050116 * `-frename-registers' is not recommended in 4.0, so `4.0-nrr' is without this option.
Thank you for taking the time to run these benchmarks and share the results with us!
The results for 4.0 clearly suck! These are big differences for microcontrollers with very limited memory space. Can you explain what is going on?
Or, am I being stupid assuming that things will *always* get better as time goes on?
Maybe things like "Moore's Law" are setting unrealistic expectations for those of us in this business. Is the Second Law of Thermodynamics affecting "gcc" development? Is ever increasing entropy is somehow negatively affecting "gcc" source code tree! :-)
Best regards, Bruce -- Bruce D. Lightner Lightner Engineering La Jolla, California Voice: +1-858-551-4011 FAX: +1-858-551-0777 Email: address@hidden URL: http://www.lightner.net/lightner/bruce/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |