Just one question: Did you extract the line
RCALL PC-0x0009
From disassembling the completeley linked executable or from disassembly of the
object file?
Possibly the linker might have replaced (PC-0x0009) by the true distance
between the PC position of the PC at the RCALL.?
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden Im Auftrag von Eric Weddington
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Mai 2007 15:17
An: 'Dr. Jan Menzel'; address@hidden
Betreff: RE: [avr-gcc-list] jump_to_null question
-----Original Message-----
From:
address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden
org] On Behalf Of Dr. Jan Menzel
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 6:40 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [avr-gcc-list] jump_to_null question
Hi all!
I'm currently working on a bootloader for Mega8 and 88
and found a
problem I do not yet understand. At the end of the bootloader the code
has to jump to the main reset vector at address 0x0000. If I do the
usual way
void (*jump_to_null)(void) = 0x0000;
gcc 3.4.6 complies:
LDI R30, 0x0102
LDI R31, 0x0103
ICALL
and everything works fine, as expected.
But if I try to be more specific and define
void (* const jump_to_main)(void) = 0x0000;
gcc 3.4.6 complies
RCALL PC-0x0009
which unfortunately does not what I intended.
Could anyone please point me to my error in reasoning
or lack of
understanding? Many thanks!
1. Why do you need to declare it const, when the first way works fine?
2. The best way to reset the AVR, is not by jumping to the reset vector.
When you do that, some of the registers may be left in a state that is not
the default. The best way to reset is to enable the watchdog timer on the
shortest time-out, go into an infinite loop, and let the watchdog reset the
AVR. Depending on which AVR you are using, you will have to turn off the
watchdog timer after reset, with code in the .init3 section, for example.
Eric
_______________________________________________
AVR-GCC-list mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list