|
From: | Sandeep K Chaudhary |
Subject: | Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC plugin for avr-gcc |
Date: | Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:23:24 -0400 |
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:18:04PM -0400, Sandeep K Chaudhary wrote:The gcc you checked appears to be the native compiler, not the one
> Hi Senthil,
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply !
>
> As reported in my previous email, I see that gcc is configured with
> "--enable-shared". Does it mean that plugin support is not turned off?
target for AVR. Is that correct?
>Sure, will do and send you the link.
> Yes, it would be great if you can please share a build off latest gcc
> with plugin support enabled.
>
> Thanks again,
> Sandeep Chaudhary.
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:38:48PM -0400, Sandeep K Chaudhary wrote:
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> I wish to implement a GCC plugin that can work with avr-gcc. I came to
> >> realize that the latest avr-gcc or avr-g++ is based off GCC 4.8.2.
> >> However, the whole GCC plugin APIs were introduced in 4.9.0.
> >> Therefore, the 'fplugin' option is not present with the latest
> >> avr-gcc.
> >>
> >> Can someone please tell me when we can expect to have the plugin
> >> support in avr-gcc? Also, is there some way to get around this problem
> >> i.e. somehow being able to use the plugin option with current avr-gcc?
> >>
> >> It would be a great help if I can get the plugin option to work with avr-gcc.
> >
> > As Jeremy said, the toolchain Atmel distributes has plugin support
> > turned off (as a unintentional side effect of configuring with
> > --disable-shared, IIRC).
> >
> > If for some reason you don't want to build off the latest gcc code, let
> > me know - I can run and share a build with plugin support turned on.
> >>
> >> Thanks and regards,
> >> Sandeep Chaudhary
> >> University of Waterloo, Canada.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AVR-GCC-list mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks and regards,
> Sandeep K Chaudhary.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |