Re: [avr-libc-dev] sscanf

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Darcy Watkins wrote:

> The return value should be the number of fields assigned (and not
> count those with assignment suppressed).

That half-sentence in the brackets is your own though.  I wish the
standard had that explicit wording.  But it appears you are right,
it's the number of assignments that ought to be returned, not the
number of successful conversions.

> This behaviour is observed in both the minimalist and floating scanf
> libraries.

Sure, there's no reason why they would be different.

Please open a bug report for this at

https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?group=avr-libc

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)