[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc pat
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750 |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:33:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
As Bernard Fouché wrote:
(about [not] malloc()ing the FP conversion buffer)
> >Of course, if there's consensus among the users that this is not
> >needed, and an additional 40 bytes on the stack are no big deal for
> >the floating-point versions, we could easily drop that completely, and
> >always allocate the buffer on the stack.
> Looking at malloc compiled code, it seems that malloc.c needs 6
> bytes of .data (reported by avr-size) and will use also 2 bytes on
> the stack when called (two registers pushed). So the net loss is
> only 32 bytes when the floating point buffer is allocated from the
> stack. ...
> I would drop the call
> to malloc/free.
OK.
> >I agree there'd better be macros for this, but how to name them?
> >
> >#define _FDEV_ERR (-1)
> >#define _FDEV_EOF (-2)
> >
> >Sounds OK?
> Since they start with '_', no problem
> >... But you're right, the initializer macro
> >you've been been proposing also has some merit, so I'll add that one,
> >too.
> its main merit is to save flash space if there is __do_copy_data().
Sure. I added FDEV_SETUP_STREAM().
> I like all these changes, now what about the other users?
I've update the doc preview
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/avr-libc-user-manual/
twidemo has now also been changed to use the new stdio interface. I
also ran some basic test cases that prove this is all working.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, (continued)
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Dmitry K., 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Dmitry K., 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Bernard Fouché, 2005/09/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Bernard Fouche, 2005/09/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Björn Haase, 2005/09/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Bernard Fouché, 2005/09/06
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Erik Christiansen, 2005/09/07
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Bernard Fouche, 2005/09/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Russell Shaw, 2005/09/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Björn Haase, 2005/09/06
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Dmitry K., 2005/09/05
[avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Please have a look at avr-libc patch #3750, Russell Shaw, 2005/09/04
Message not available