[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-libc-dev] Suggested ISR function
|
From: |
James A.R. Koehler |
|
Subject: |
[avr-libc-dev] Suggested ISR function |
|
Date: |
Thu, 08 Sep 2005 16:19:00 +0000 |
I'd vote for depreciating both SIGNAL and INTERRUPT in favour of ISR.
Indeed, I'd go further and suggest that it intrinsically be the given
the attribute of '__naked__' as, for the life of me, I can't see why it
is useful to have r0 and r1 set every time an interrupt occurs.
Jim
- [avr-libc-dev] Suggested ISR function,
James A.R. Koehler <=