[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is f
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:56:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
As Russell Shaw wrote:
> Linux code has rmb() and wmb() for "read memory barrier" and "write
> memory barrier", to solve that reordering problem. Something might
> be learned from finding how those macros are defined.
They end up in a spaghetti of header files, but if my brain can
trace that right, they simply end up in an
__asm__ volatile(::"memory")
unless the underlying CPU offers a better instruction to implement
this.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty, anonymous, 2005/09/22
- [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty, anonymous, 2005/09/22
- [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty, anonymous, 2005/09/22
- [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty, anonymous, 2005/09/23
- [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty, anonymous, 2005/09/23
- [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty, anonymous, 2005/09/26
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/26
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty, Russell Shaw, 2005/09/26
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty, Dmitry K., 2005/09/26
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #14616] definition of sei() in interrupts.h is faulty, Björn Haase, 2005/09/27