Re: [avr-libc-dev] Progmem types compatibility

[Joerg Wunsch]

As David Brown wrote:

> Would it be possible to replace the typedef with a #define?

That's always problematic, given the vastly different way between
the way a macro and a typedef are actually operating.

> I haven't looked at it in detail, so that's just a stab in the dark
> - but it might get the "delay until use" effect you want.

Well, if someone can come up with a scheme that will really work that
way, I agree we could do that (with the __PROG_TYPE_COMPAT__ option to
fall back to the typedef-based deprecated implementation).
-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)