[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 21:29:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
As E. Weddington wrote:
> > Per definitionem, that's the same.
> I know. I just prefer *explicit* definitions as I was planning on
> using the values as offsets.
You still can, even without the explicit definitions, as long as
your C implementation adhers to the standard. :)
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, (continued)
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, E. Weddington, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, E. Weddington, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Brian Dean, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, E. Weddington, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Brian Dean, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Joerg Wunsch, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, E. Weddington, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, E. Weddington, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Brian Dean, 2003/02/13
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/02/13