[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude
From: |
Brian Dean |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2003 22:11:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1i |
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:04:17PM -0800, Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> On my athlon system with current, unpatched cvs source:
>
> Writing | ################################################## | 100% 17.62s
> avrdude: 32052 bytes of f written
> avrdude done. Thank you.
> real 0m18.074s
>
> With my patch:
>
> Writing | ################################################## | 100% 16.57s
> avrdude: 32052 bytes of f written
> avrdude done. Thank you.
> real 0m17.046s
>
> And again for grins, uisp is a tad slower than avrdude:
>
> Uploading: flash
> ################################
> (total 32052 bytes transferred in 19.04 s (1684 bytes/s)
> Polling: count = 126, min/avg/max = 2.31/2.33/2.79 ms
> real 0m19.441s
>
> Looks like linux just isn't as efficient with it's ppdev driver as FreeBSD
> is with ppi.
Mine is also a 2200 Athlon vs your 1800 Athlon - that may account for
the difference instead.
Even though the programming times with vs without the patch don't show
a huge improvement, I still think some form of the patch should go in.
My original logic was flawed, which was exposed by address@hidden's
oscilloscope debugging, and brought into more light by Jan-Hinnerk who
noticed the flaw.
-Brian
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, (continued)
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Brian Dean, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Brian Dean, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Brian Dean, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Brian Dean, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Brian Dean, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude,
Brian Dean <=
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/11/18
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/19
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/11/19
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Brian Dean, 2003/11/19
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/11/19
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Bad programming speed on AT90S8535 using AVRdude, Brian Dean, 2003/11/18