[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Dec 2003 13:14:37 -0700 |
On 9 Dec 2003 at 13:22, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert wrote:
<snip>
> However, we can still discuss the outport format. Right now it looks
> like this:
> Device code: 0x34 AT90S2333
> Device code: 0x38 AT90S8515
> Device code: 0x48 (unknown)
> Device code: 0x4c AT90S2343
> Device code: 0x55 ATtiny12
>
> Perhaps it looks better like this:
> Device code: 0x38 - AT90S8515
> Device code: 0x48 - (unknown)
> or:
> Device code: 0x38 = AT90S8515
> Device code: 0x48 = (unknown)
>
I kinda like the equals sign format. But I'm ok with any of the above.
My 2 cents.
Eric
- [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/12/08
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c, E. Weddington, 2003/12/08
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/12/08
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c, E. Weddington, 2003/12/08
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/12/09
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c,
E. Weddington <=
- RE: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c, Alex Shepherd, 2003/12/09
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/12/09
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/12/09
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2003/12/10
Re: [avrdude-dev] Cleaning up of avr910.c, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/12/08