[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] cvs back again and butterfly cleanup
From: |
Michael Mayer |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] cvs back again and butterfly cleanup |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:00:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 13:11:21 +0100, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert wrote:
> IMHO it would be better to make a more general change: We should give
> _every_ programmer the chance to autodetect the part, if none was
> selected at the command line. Autodetect should at least work for PPI
> and AVR910, if the device signature is not locked (and if the chip is
> not an AT90S1200 ;-)
Oh, yes, you are right. Using the signature is a much more general and more
flexible approach. I think it should be possible to make the "-p" switch
optional defaulting to autodetection using the device signature if the -p is
not used. I will check this out at the weekend.
Michael