[avrdude-dev] [bug #35265] Findings reported by cppcheck

[Joerg Wunsch]

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #35265 (project avrdude):

OK, thanks, with the commandline, I can reproduce the
messages now.

> 'Our' usleep is the old posix usleep

You're right.  While I don't think any of the actual systems
are going to remove it in the near future, it certainly makes
sense to replace it by nanosleep().

Given that nanosleep() is quoted (in FreeBSD's manpage) to
originate in Posix.1 (IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993), are there any
actual systems around we want to be portable to (various
Linuxes, *BSD, Solaris, MacOS X) which don't have it?

I agree about the new implementation file.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?35265>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/