[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %
From: |
Waldek Hebisch |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and % |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:51:54 +0200 (CEST) |
Bill Page wrote:
> Even more exciting is the fact that using the $bootStrapMode flag
> discovered by Waldek the same code is compiled by SPAD without
> complaint!
>
> -------
> )lisp (setq |$bootStrapMode| t)
> )abbrev domain T T
>
> Decl == Record(name: Symbol, type: T)
>
> T(): Public == Private where
> Public ==> with
> type: Symbol -> %
> decl: (Symbol, %) -> Decl
> Private ==> add
> decl(n:Symbol,t:%):Decl == [n,t]
> type(x:Symbol):% == x pretend %
>
> -------
>
> I wonder why '$bootStrapMode t' is not the normal default mode of
> operation for SPAD? Is the generated code less efficient?
>
'$bootStrapMode t' means there is no "real" code. You need to compile
second time in normal mode to compile executable part.
Concerning the example above, I tried to get executable code from it,
but I already have problems at first declaration. More precisely,
consider:
)abbrev domain DECL Decl
Decl == Record(name: Symbol, type: Symbol)
I get:
>> System error:
Caught fatal error [memory may be damaged]
regardless of $bootStrapMode. The same if change the above to:
)abbrev category DECL Decl
Decl == Record(name: Symbol, type: Symbol)
If I try:
)abbrev category DECL Decl
Decl: Category == Record(name: Symbol, type: Symbol)
I get:
Internal Error
Error while instantiating type Category
protected-symbol-warn called with (NIL)
--
Waldek Hebisch
address@hidden
- RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, (continued)
- RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/16
- RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Page, Bill, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, root, 2006/10/17
- RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Page, Bill, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %,
Waldek Hebisch <=
- RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Page, Bill, 2006/10/17
- RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Page, Bill, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/17