Re: [Ayttm-users] Compliance with FHS

[Andy]

On Wednesday 26 March 2003 08:38, Colin Leroy wrote:
> On 25 Mar 2003 at 21h44, Ben Reser wrote:
> > Before we release 0.2.3 can we place make ayttm compliant with the FHS?
[snip]
> I'm personnaly not against it but would like to know what other
> developers, and current users, think about it:

I'm all for putting things where they should be.

> Does anyone mind changing his prefs ?
>
> People upgrading for 0.2.2 to 0.2.3 without reading the release notes will
> get nice segfaults, too, but I guess people not reading doc ask for it ;-)

Maybe if we go to 0.3.0 more people might read them :-)

Andy