1) conf.h / conf.c are handling the loading/saving of the configfile.
gtk+2.0 has a "Key-file parser" which is exactly what we need. Do we
want to use the library functions or do we want to use the old
implementation? The Keyfile parser is in the library we use right now,
so no extra dependency would be created but the code would be much
more readable. I think the same functionality could be achieved with
much lesser code, should help to decrease the memory foot print ^^
What the old implementation could do is support "multiple config
files" (or I think they do). This comes from the observation because
the function get_string_conf is called something like
"General/Category/Key" and "General" obviously means which config
file. I do not see the need of multiple config files. Should this
feature be saved?
2) what about those old files that we don't really use (like
old_editor.c) could they be removed?
3) do we still need the bl-file load feature (as far as I know that
thing didn't really worked anyway)? Can I remove it? What other
features don't we need?
_______________________________________________
Beaver-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/beaver-devel