[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bibulus-users] New entry type: manuscript?
From: |
Thomas Widmann |
Subject: |
[Bibulus-users] New entry type: manuscript? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 May 2004 22:23:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
three months ago, Jesse Billett wrote the following to Bibulus-users
(see the archive for the full message):
> [...]
> So this would require the following traditional BibTeX-style fields:
>
> Address: Florence
> Library: Biblioteca Laurenziana
> Shelfmark: Amiatino I (the MS prefix doesn't apply to all
> styles... needs to be optional)
> Pagerange: [empty if all]
> X-te: s. vii--viii (before A.D. 716) [ "s" here is for the
> Latin "saecula", and refers
> to the centuries when the book might have been made]
> Origin: Jarrow or Wearmouth, Northumbria
> Standardref: \CLA III, 299 % (use a macro for abbreviated names.
> This one is "Codices Latini Antiquiories",
> a standard ref. work)
> Edition: [citation key for an edition of the manuscript]
> Seealso: [pp.~11--12, nn.~12--13, Plates VIII, IX]{Lowe:1960}
> [pp. 71, 199]{Bischoff:1999}
> [...]
Apart from Seealso (which is an annotation, I think), Address and
Pagerange, the fields seem to be new (what is meant by 'X-te' -- is it
just a date?). Should we make a new entry type called <manuscript>
with at least additional fields <library>, <shelfmark> and <origin>?
/Thomas
--
Thomas Widmann Bye-bye to BibTeX: join the Bibulus project now!
address@hidden <http://www.bibulus.org>
Glasgow, Scotland, EU <http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/bibulus/>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Bibulus-users] New entry type: manuscript?,
Thomas Widmann <=