Re: yy_state_t

[Paul Eggert]

On 10/21/19 2:27 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
> I'm ambivalent for glr.c and lalr1.cc, since they already use int everywhere 
> for states, and are unlikely to benefit from the width reduction.  Except for 
> the auxiliary state stack for LAC in lalr1.cc.
>
> I do like the fact that the skeletons are more consistent between them (I will 
> rename the types for states afterwards), but still...  I'd appreciate other 
> opinions.

If they're unlikely to benefit from width reduction, I wouldn't bother. 
(I don't have a strong feeling about it either.)