[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 3/6] cex: use usual routines for diagnostics about S/R conflicts
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
[PATCH 3/6] cex: use usual routines for diagnostics about S/R conflicts |
|
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jul 2020 08:03:56 +0200 |
See previous commit. We go from
input.y: warning: 3 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
Example exp "+" exp • "⊕" exp
Shift derivation
exp
↳ exp "+" exp
↳ exp • "⊕" exp
to
input.y: warning: 3 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕" [-Wcounterexamples]
Example exp "+" exp • "⊕" exp
Shift derivation
exp
↳ exp "+" exp
↳ exp • "⊕" exp
with an hyperlink on -Wcounterexamples.
* src/counterexample.c (counterexample_report_shift_reduce):
Use complain.
* tests/counterexample.at, tests/diagnostics.at, tests/report.at:
Adjust.
---
src/counterexample.c | 11 +++++--
tests/conflicts.at | 6 ++--
tests/counterexample.at | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
tests/diagnostics.at | 8 ++---
tests/report.at | 20 ++++++------
5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/counterexample.c b/src/counterexample.c
index 90a1739e..426d131e 100644
--- a/src/counterexample.c
+++ b/src/counterexample.c
@@ -1248,8 +1248,15 @@ counterexample_report_shift_reduce (state_item_number
itm1, state_item_number it
symbol_number next_sym,
FILE *out, const char *prefix)
{
- fputs (prefix, out);
- fprintf (out, _("Shift/reduce conflict on token %s:\n"),
symbols[next_sym]->tag);
+ if (out == stderr)
+ complain (NULL, Wcounterexamples,
+ _("shift/reduce conflict on token %s"), symbols[next_sym]->tag);
+ else
+ {
+ fputs (prefix, out);
+ fprintf (out, _("shift/reduce conflict on token %s"),
symbols[next_sym]->tag);
+ fprintf (out, "%s\n", _(":"));
+ }
// In the report, print the items.
if (*prefix || trace_flag & trace_cex)
{
diff --git a/tests/conflicts.at b/tests/conflicts.at
index 529f7406..187085c3 100644
--- a/tests/conflicts.at
+++ b/tests/conflicts.at
@@ -861,7 +861,7 @@ State 5
OP [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
$default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
- Shift/reduce conflict on token OP:
+ shift/reduce conflict on token OP:
1 exp: exp OP exp .
1 exp: exp . OP exp
Example exp OP exp . OP exp
@@ -1764,7 +1764,7 @@ State 4
reported_conflicts go to state 6
- Shift/reduce conflict on token 'a':
+ shift/reduce conflict on token 'a':
10 reported_conflicts: . %empty
8 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
First example resolved_conflict . 'a' 'a'
@@ -1778,7 +1778,7 @@ State 4
`-> resolved_conflict reported_conflicts 'a'
`-> .
- Shift/reduce conflict on token 'a':
+ shift/reduce conflict on token 'a':
10 reported_conflicts: . %empty
9 reported_conflicts: . 'a'
First example resolved_conflict . 'a' 'a'
diff --git a/tests/counterexample.at b/tests/counterexample.at
index 270e511e..c6c07320 100644
--- a/tests/counterexample.at
+++ b/tests/counterexample.at
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ y: A | A B;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A . B C
Shift derivation
s
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
input.y:4.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A . B C
Shift derivation s -> [ y -> [ A . B ] c -> [ C ] ]
Reduce derivation s -> [ a -> [ A . ] x -> [ B C ] ]
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ bc: B bc C | B C;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A . B C
Shift derivation
s
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
`-> a bc
`-> A . `-> B C
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A A . B B C C
Shift derivation
s
@@ -128,12 +128,12 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
input.y:6.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A . B C
Shift derivation s -> [ ac -> [ A ac -> [ b -> [ . B ] ] C ] ]
Reduce derivation s -> [ a -> [ A . ] bc -> [ B C ] ]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A A . B B C C
Shift derivation s -> [ ac -> [ A ac -> [ A ac -> [ b -> [ . b -> [ B B
] ] ] C ] C ] ]
Reduce derivation s -> [ a -> [ A a -> [ A . ] ] bc -> [ B bc -> [ B C ]
C ] ]
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ xby: B | X xby Y;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A . B
Shift derivation
s
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
`-> A x `-> B y
`-> . `-> %empty
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
First example A X . B Y $end
Shift derivation
$accept
@@ -194,12 +194,12 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
input.y:5.4-9: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A . B
Shift derivation s -> [ A xby -> [ . B ] ]
Reduce derivation s -> [ ax -> [ A x -> [ . ] ] by -> [ B y -> [ ] ] ]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
First example A X . B Y $end
Shift derivation $accept -> [ s -> [ A xby -> [ X xby -> [ . B ] Y ] ]
$end ]
Second example A X . B y $end
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ bc: B C;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token C:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token C [-Wcounterexamples]
First example B . C $end
Shift derivation
$accept
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token C:
input.y:6.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token C:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token C [-Wcounterexamples]
First example B . C $end
Shift derivation $accept -> [ g -> [ x -> [ bc -> [ B . C ] ] ] $end ]
Second example B . C D $end
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ y: A A B;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
First example A . A B $end
Shift derivation
$accept
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
First example A . A B $end
Shift derivation $accept -> [ s -> [ t -> [ y -> [ A . A B ] ] ] $end ]
Second example A . A $end
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ y: Y;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
Example b . A X X Y
Shift derivation
a
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
`-> b . `-> A x xy
`-> X `-> X Y
-Shift/reduce conflict on token X:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token X [-Wcounterexamples]
First example A X . X
Shift derivation
a
@@ -357,12 +357,12 @@ input.y:4.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to
conflicts [-Wother]
input.y:8.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 2 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
Example b . A X X Y
Shift derivation a -> [ s -> [ b . xx -> [ A X X ] y -> [ Y ] ] ]
Reduce derivation a -> [ r -> [ b . ] t -> [ A x -> [ X ] xy -> [ X Y ] ]
]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token X:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token X [-Wcounterexamples]
First example A X . X
Shift derivation a -> [ t -> [ A xx -> [ X . X ] ] ]
Second example X . X xy
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ i: X | i J K;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token J [-Wcounterexamples]
time limit exceeded: XXX
First example H i . J K $end
Shift derivation
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ time limit exceeded: XXX
input.y:4.4-6: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token J [-Wcounterexamples]
time limit exceeded: XXX
First example H i . J K $end
Shift derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ H i -> [ i . J K ] ] $end ]
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ b: A B C | A B D;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example N A . B C
Shift derivation
s
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
`-> N a B
`-> A .
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example N N A . B D C
Shift derivation
s
@@ -553,12 +553,12 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
input.y:5.4: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example N A . B C
Shift derivation s -> [ n -> [ N b -> [ A . B C ] ] ]
Reduce derivation s -> [ n -> [ N a -> [ A . ] B ] C ]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token B:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token B [-Wcounterexamples]
Example N N A . B D C
Shift derivation s -> [ n -> [ N n -> [ N b -> [ A . B D ] ] C ] ]
Reduce derivation s -> [ n -> [ N n -> [ N a -> [ A . ] B ] D ] C ]
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ time limit exceeded: XXX
`-> c A
`-> .
-Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
time limit exceeded: XXX
First example b c . A
Shift derivation
@@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token A
[-Wcounterexamples]
`-> c A
`-> .
-Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
First example b c . A
Shift derivation
a
@@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ time limit exceeded: XXX
Second example c . A $end
Second derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ c d -> [ c -> [ . ] A ] ] $end ]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
time limit exceeded: XXX
First example b c . A
Shift derivation a -> [ b d -> [ c . A ] ]
@@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on token A
[-Wcounterexamples]
Second example b c . A $end
Second derivation $accept -> [ a -> [ b d -> [ a -> [ c d -> [ c -> [ . ]
A ] ] ] ] $end ]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token A:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token A [-Wcounterexamples]
First example b c . A
Shift derivation a -> [ b d -> [ c . A ] ]
Second example b c . A $end
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ i: %empty | i J;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token J [-Wcounterexamples]
Example H i J . J J
Shift derivation
s
@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
input.y:5.13-15: warning: rule useless in parser due to conflicts [-Wother]
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token J:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token J [-Wcounterexamples]
Example H i J . J J
Shift derivation s -> [ a -> [ H i J . J ] J ]
Reduce derivation s -> [ a -> [ H i -> [ i J . ] J J ] ]
@@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ d: D;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token D [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A a . D
Shift derivation
s
@@ -918,7 +918,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token D [-Wcounterexamples]
Example A a . D
Shift derivation s -> [ A a d -> [ . D ] ]
Reduce derivation s -> [ A a a -> [ b -> [ c -> [ . ] ] ] d -> [ D ] ]
@@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ d: D;
AT_BISON_CHECK_CEX(
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token D [-Wcounterexamples]
First example A a . D $end
Shift derivation
$accept
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
]],
[[input.y: warning: 1 shift/reduce conflict [-Wconflicts-sr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token D:
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token D [-Wcounterexamples]
First example A a . D $end
Shift derivation $accept -> [ s -> [ A a d -> [ . D ] ] $end ]
Second example A a . D E $end
diff --git a/tests/diagnostics.at b/tests/diagnostics.at
index 47581049..0ef480e7 100644
--- a/tests/diagnostics.at
+++ b/tests/diagnostics.at
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ exp
]],
[1],
[[input.y: <error>error:</error> shift/reduce conflicts: 4 found, 0 expected
-Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
+input.y: <warning>warning:</warning> shift/reduce conflict on token "+"
[<warning>-Wcounterexamples</warning>]
Example <cex-0><cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf>
<cex-leaf>"+"</cex-leaf><cex-1> <cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf> <cex-dot>•</cex-dot>
<cex-leaf>"+"</cex-leaf> <cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf></cex-1></cex-0>
Shift derivation
<cex-0><cex-step>exp</cex-step></cex-0>
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
<cex-0><cex-step>↳ <cex-1><cex-step>exp</cex-step></cex-1><cex-leaf>
"+"</cex-leaf><cex-leaf> exp</cex-leaf></cex-step></cex-0>
<cex-1><cex-step> ↳ <cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf><cex-leaf>
"+"</cex-leaf><cex-leaf> exp</cex-leaf><cex-dot> •</cex-dot></cex-step></cex-1>
-Shift/reduce conflict on token "else":
+input.y: <warning>warning:</warning> shift/reduce conflict on token "else"
[<warning>-Wcounterexamples</warning>]
Example <cex-0><cex-leaf>"if"</cex-leaf>
<cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf> <cex-leaf>"then"</cex-leaf><cex-1>
<cex-leaf>"if"</cex-leaf> <cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf> <cex-leaf>"then"</cex-leaf>
<cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf> <cex-dot>•</cex-dot> <cex-leaf>"else"</cex-leaf>
<cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf></cex-1></cex-0>
Shift derivation
<cex-0><cex-step>exp</cex-step></cex-0>
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token "else":
<cex-0><cex-step>↳ <cex-leaf>"if"</cex-leaf><cex-leaf>
exp</cex-leaf><cex-leaf> "then"</cex-leaf><cex-1><cex-step>
exp</cex-step></cex-1><cex-leaf>
"else"</cex-leaf><cex-leaf> exp</cex-leaf></cex-step></cex-0>
<cex-1><cex-step> ↳ <cex-leaf>"if"</cex-leaf><cex-leaf>
exp</cex-leaf><cex-leaf> "then"</cex-leaf><cex-leaf> exp</cex-leaf><cex-dot>
•</cex-dot></cex-step></cex-1>
-Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
+input.y: <warning>warning:</warning> shift/reduce conflict on token "+"
[<warning>-Wcounterexamples</warning>]
Example <cex-0><cex-leaf>"if"</cex-leaf>
<cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf> <cex-leaf>"then"</cex-leaf><cex-1>
<cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf> <cex-dot>•</cex-dot> <cex-leaf>"+"</cex-leaf>
<cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf></cex-1></cex-0>
Shift derivation
<cex-0><cex-step>exp</cex-step></cex-0>
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
<cex-0><cex-step>↳ <cex-1><cex-step>exp</cex-step></cex-1><cex-leaf>
"+"</cex-leaf><cex-leaf> exp</cex-leaf></cex-step></cex-0>
<cex-1><cex-step> ↳ <cex-leaf>"if"</cex-leaf><cex-leaf>
exp</cex-leaf><cex-leaf> "then"</cex-leaf><cex-leaf> exp</cex-leaf><cex-dot>
•</cex-dot></cex-step></cex-1>
-Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
+input.y: <warning>warning:</warning> shift/reduce conflict on token "+"
[<warning>-Wcounterexamples</warning>]
Example <cex-0><cex-leaf>"if"</cex-leaf>
<cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf> <cex-leaf>"then"</cex-leaf> <cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf>
<cex-leaf>"else"</cex-leaf><cex-1> <cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf>
<cex-dot>•</cex-dot> <cex-leaf>"+"</cex-leaf>
<cex-leaf>exp</cex-leaf></cex-1></cex-0>
Shift derivation
<cex-0><cex-step>exp</cex-step></cex-0>
diff --git a/tests/report.at b/tests/report.at
index ea00d0ad..b12d742c 100644
--- a/tests/report.at
+++ b/tests/report.at
@@ -1537,7 +1537,7 @@ exp
AT_CHECK([LC_ALL="$locale" bison -fno-caret -o input.cc -rall -Wcex
--graph=input.gv --xml input.y], [], [],
[[input.y: warning: 3 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]
input.y: warning: 3 reduce/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-rr]
-Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕" [-Wcounterexamples]
Example exp "+" exp • "⊕" exp
Shift derivation
exp
@@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ input.y: warning: reduce/reduce conflict on tokens $end,
"+", "⊕" [-Wcounterex
exp
↳ exp "+" exp •
-Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕" [-Wcounterexamples]
Example exp "+" exp • "⊕" exp
Shift derivation
exp
@@ -1568,7 +1568,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
↳ exp "⊕" exp
↳ exp "+" exp •
-Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕" [-Wcounterexamples]
Example exp "⊕" exp • "⊕" exp
Shift derivation
exp
@@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
↳ exp "⊕" exp
↳ exp "⊕" exp •
-Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token "+" [-Wcounterexamples]
Example exp "⊕" exp • "+" exp
Shift derivation
exp
@@ -1590,7 +1590,7 @@ Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
↳ exp "+" exp
↳ exp "⊕" exp •
-Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
+input.y: warning: shift/reduce conflict on token "+" [-Wcounterexamples]
Example exp "⊕" exp • "+" exp
Shift derivation
exp
@@ -1745,7 +1745,7 @@ State 7
Conflict between rule 2 and token "+" resolved as reduce (%left "+").
- Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
+ shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
2 exp: exp "+" exp •
1 exp: exp • "⊕" exp
Example exp "+" exp • "⊕" exp
@@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@ State 7
exp
↳ exp "+" exp •
- Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
+ shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
3 exp: exp "+" exp •
1 exp: exp • "⊕" exp
Example exp "+" exp • "⊕" exp
@@ -1798,7 +1798,7 @@ State 8
"⊕" [reduce using rule 1 (exp)]
$default reduce using rule 1 (exp)
- Shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
+ shift/reduce conflict on token "⊕":
1 exp: exp "⊕" exp •
1 exp: exp • "⊕" exp
Example exp "⊕" exp • "⊕" exp
@@ -1811,7 +1811,7 @@ State 8
↳ exp "⊕" exp
↳ exp "⊕" exp •
- Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
+ shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
1 exp: exp "⊕" exp •
2 exp: exp • "+" exp
Example exp "⊕" exp • "+" exp
@@ -1824,7 +1824,7 @@ State 8
↳ exp "+" exp
↳ exp "⊕" exp •
- Shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
+ shift/reduce conflict on token "+":
1 exp: exp "⊕" exp •
3 exp: exp • "+" exp
Example exp "⊕" exp • "+" exp
--
2.27.0
- [PATCH 0/6] diagnostics: more changes for cex, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/20
- [PATCH 1/6] diagnostics: use hyperlinks to point to the only documentation, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/20
- [PATCH 2/6] cex: use usual routines for diagnostics about R/R conflicts, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/20
- [PATCH 3/6] cex: use usual routines for diagnostics about S/R conflicts,
Akim Demaille <=
- [PATCH 4/6] cex: don't issue an empty line between counterexamples, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/20
- [PATCH 5/6] cex: improve readability of the subsections, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/20
- [PATCH 6/6] cex: label all the derivations by their initial action, Akim Demaille, 2020/07/20