[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product
|
From: |
Kacper Gutowski |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product |
|
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jul 2016 13:57:07 +0200 |
On 7 July 2016 at 12:55, Jay Foad wrote:
> (⊂+/3 4 ⍴ 5 6)≡3 4 +.⍴ 5 6
> 1
Ah, I see what you mean. But it still wasn't my error, it's really what
ISO says. It's not equivalent to APL2 definition, nor to Dyalog's one,
and it seems to be wrong altogether.
-k
- [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Xiao-Yong Jin, 2016/07/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/07/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Jay Foad, 2016/07/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/07/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Jay Foad, 2016/07/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product,
Kacper Gutowski <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Jay Foad, 2016/07/08
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Kacper Gutowski, 2016/07/08
- Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Jay Foad, 2016/07/08
Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Juergen Sauermann, 2016/07/07
Re: [Bug-apl] multiple inner product, Jay Foad, 2016/07/07