[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all
From: |
Mosè Giordano |
Subject: |
bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:11:23 +0100 |
Hi Tassilo,
2015-12-13 17:55 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>> (re-search-forward "\\[[^]]*\\<label")
>>>
>>> at the beginning of the buffer suggested by Nils. So, it doesn't
>>> seem there is an incomplete match, but simply "\\[[^]]*" is too
>>> greedy.
>>
>> This expression contains only a single explicit wildcard. A stack
>> overflow for it most certainly is a bug. Is this really fixed in 25.1
>> or is there just a larger stack?
>
> I also get a stack overflow with this starting with a buffer size of
> about 800 lines. But I can run
>
> (re-search-forward reftex-everything-regexp nil t)
>
> without problems even after adding 100.000 more "foo foo foo..." lines
> to the test file...
Uh, in Emacs 24.5
(re-search-forward "\\[[^]]*\\<label" nil t)
throws the stack overflow error, indeed I tested also this
possibility. So are you saying that in Emacs 25.1 the noerror option
prevents stack overflow? Anyway, how about my suggestion to use
"\\[[^]]\{0,1000\}\\<label"
? 1000 characters are 12.5 80-column-wide lines, I think it's large enough.
Bye,
Mosè
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Nils Kanning, 2015/12/11
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Mosè Giordano, 2015/12/11
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Tassilo Horn, 2015/12/12
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Nils Kanning, 2015/12/12
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Mosè Giordano, 2015/12/12
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, David Kastrup, 2015/12/12
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Mosè Giordano, 2015/12/13
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, David Kastrup, 2015/12/13
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Tassilo Horn, 2015/12/13
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all,
Mosè Giordano <=
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Tassilo Horn, 2015/12/13
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, David Kastrup, 2015/12/13
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Tassilo Horn, 2015/12/13
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Mosè Giordano, 2015/12/13
- bug#22146: Stack overflow in reftex-parse-all, Tassilo Horn, 2015/12/13