[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: can I suppress "invalid unused variable name"?
From: |
Tim Van Holder |
Subject: |
Re: can I suppress "invalid unused variable name"? |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Aug 2001 18:15:27 +0200 |
This is really an automake issue, so I'm sending it there.
> From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of
> Steve M. Robbins
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 17:58
> To: GNU autoconf Mailing List
> Subject: can I suppress "invalid unused variable name"?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am working with a library (CGAL) that is not autoconfigured, but has
> its own system that generates a makefile fragment with important make
> variables defined. In particular, it defines CGAL_LDFLAGS.
>
> In my Makefile.am, I use
>
> include $(CGAL_MAKEFILE)
> ...
> LDADD = ... $(CGAL_LDFLAGS) ...
>
> and automake complains:
>
> Makefile.am: invalid unused variable name: `CGAL_LDFLAGS'
>
> [Incidentally, there used to be a line number attached to this diagnostic,
> but that suddenly stopped. (??)]
>
> Since automake does generate the correct output Makefile.in, I can
> live with seeing this message all the time. However, I am concerned
> that this "warning" may change to an error in the future, and my
> builds will suddenly break. Thus I wonder: what is the automake-blessed
> way to deal with including makefile fragments that define variables
> that automake considers its own?
>
> I used to be able to suppress this behaviour by a dummy assign to
> CGAL_LDFLAGS (before including CGAL_MAKEFILE, of course!). But that
> trick has stopped working.
>
> Thanks,
> -Steve
>
>
> --
> by Rocket to the Moon,
> by Airplane to the Rocket,
> by Taxi to the Airport,
> by Frontdoor to the Taxi,
> by throwing back the blanket and laying down the legs ...
> - They Might Be Giants
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: can I suppress "invalid unused variable name"?,
Tim Van Holder <=