[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS automake testsuite failures
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: CVS automake testsuite failures |
Date: |
22 Mar 2002 11:36:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) |
| >>> "Raja" == Raja R Harinath <address@hidden> writes:
| [...]
|
| Raja> In general, shouldn't we just
|
| Raja> unset CONFIG_SITE
|
| Raja> in the 'defs' file. This'll dissociate the testsuite a
| Raja> bit more from the execution environment.
|
| Or even
|
| CONFIG_SITE=/dev/null
| export CONFIG_SITE
|
| to override default path.
|
| How comes Autoconf's own testsuite doesn't do something similar?
Because it helps us understand, in some case, the weird interaction
that can happen with such files.
I prefer to have to say sometimes, ``well, disregard this false
failures which are due to unexpected output from configure'', rather
than discover too late that some form of config.site actually broke
something.
But I might change my mind...
- CVS automake testsuite failures, Nicolas Joly, 2002/03/08
- Re: CVS automake testsuite failures, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/21
- Re: CVS automake testsuite failures, Nicolas Joly, 2002/03/21
- Re: CVS automake testsuite failures, Nicolas Joly, 2002/03/21
- Re: CVS automake testsuite failures, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/21
- Re: CVS automake testsuite failures, Nicolas Joly, 2002/03/21
- Re: CVS automake testsuite failures, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/21
- Re: CVS automake testsuite failures, Akim Demaille, 2002/03/22
- Re: CVS automake testsuite failures, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/25
- Re: CVS automake testsuite failures, Nicolas Joly, 2002/03/26
- Re: CVS automake testsuite failures, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2002/03/26