FYI: document dist_lisp_LISP (Was: Re: Automake 1.7.3 released)

[Alexandre Duret-Lutz]

>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:

>>> "Simon" == Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

 Simon> It shouldn't be required to put lisp_LISP *.el's in EXTRA_DIST.

 adl> It would be wrong to automatically distribute these *.el files,
 adl> as some of them can be generated at build time.  However, I
 adl> agree that Automake could support dist_lisp_LISP to ease
 adl> everybody's life.

In fact it does already support dist_lisp_LISP.  (For instance
the Autoconf package is using it.)  So all we need is some
documentation.

I'm checking this in on HEAD and branch-1-7.

2003-02-26  Alexandre Duret-Lutz  <address@hidden>

        * automake.texi (Emacs Lisp): Mention that `dist_' can be used.

Index: automake.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/automake.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.305.2.17
diff -u -r1.305.2.17 automake.texi
--- automake.texi       23 Feb 2003 18:52:19 -0000      1.305.2.17
+++ automake.texi       26 Feb 2003 21:00:55 -0000
@@ -3827,6 +3827,12 @@
 strange setups to cope for themselves than to make the installation less
 nice for everybody else.
 
address@hidden dist_lisp_LISP
address@hidden dist_noinst_LISP
+Lisp sources are not distributed by default.  You can prefix the
address@hidden primary with @code{dist_}, as in @code{dist_lisp_LISP} or
address@hidden, to indicate that these files should be
+distributed.
 
 @node gettext, Libtool, Emacs Lisp, Other GNU Tools
 @section Gettext
-- 
Alexandre Duret-Lutz