[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: handle sinclude
|
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
|
Subject: |
Re: FYI: handle sinclude |
|
Date: |
Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:55:03 +0100 |
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:32:07AM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> I don't know cases where sinclude is really what's meant, usually
> that's "include" that is wished, but original Autoconf undef'ed
> include (too common a word) but left sinclude. Today, the PC way is
> m4_include. So I'm not sure Automake ought to follow sinclude.
Hey, obsoleting sinclude is Autoconf's concern, isn't it? As long as
that macro is usable and Automake can honor it without difficulty, I
think it should do it for backward compatibility.