[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
not depend on AM_MAINTAINER_MODE [Re: does not rebuild Makefile.in]
From: |
Ilya N. Golubev |
Subject: |
not depend on AM_MAINTAINER_MODE [Re: does not rebuild Makefile.in] |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:15:32 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux) |
> This seems like an automake question, not a make question.
Confirming it to be so: (it is the bug described in)
<address@hidden> (posted) to <address@hidden> on Wed,
20 Aug 2008 22:43:38 +0400. So moving the discussion from
<address@hidden> here.
> You must 'configure
> --enable-maintainer-mode' to
However, that bug does not need neither `AM_MAINTAINER_MODE' called in
`configure' sources nor `--enable-maintainer-mode' passed to
`configure'. The broken command for `$(srcdir)/Makefile.in' target
does not depend on these, it is always generated the same.
`--disable-maintainer-mode' only makes prerequisite list for that
target to be empty. When `AM_MAINTAINER_MODE' is not called, the
target is always present, and with full prerequisite list. So, both
in this case and when `AM_MAINTAINER_MODE' is called and
`--enable-maintainer-mode', the bug will manifest the same way.
Anyway, many projects do not call `AM_MAINTAINER_MODE'. (From free
ones can easily recall coreutils 6.12.) If you (or anybody else) care
for detailed circumstances of me hitting that bug, neither did my
projects call `AM_MAINTAINER_MODE', both production ones and toy ones
(written solely to ease isolating the bug).
- not depend on AM_MAINTAINER_MODE [Re: does not rebuild Makefile.in],
Ilya N. Golubev <=