[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: missing help2man
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: missing help2man |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:46:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Werner LEMBERG wrote on Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 07:18:46AM CET:
>
> > Anyway, maintainer-mode isn't very interesting; few packages use it.
> > The more important question is what to do in non-maintainer mode,
> > where (it seems to me) exactly the same problem will occur. For
> > instance, in GNU Hello (well, except that has only one man page) or
> > coreutils.
>
> Well, if `make' called by the user has to generate man pages with the
> use of help2man, there *must* be a configure check for it. I don't
> see a problem.
The point is that this problem should only ever show up when you use
VCS sources to build from, never from a release tarball: the tarball
should always contain a copy of the man pages, and not need to rebuild
them. Thus it would be over-reaching for example, to require that
help2man is present, when configure is run from an extracted tarball.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: missing help2man, (continued)
- Re: missing help2man, Karl Berry, 2008/11/26
- Re: missing help2man, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/11/27
- Re: missing help2man, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/27
- Re: missing help2man, Karl Berry, 2008/11/27
- Re: missing help2man, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/11/28
- Re: missing help2man, Karl Berry, 2008/11/28
- Re: missing help2man, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/11/29
- Re: missing help2man, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/29
- Re: missing help2man, Karl Berry, 2008/11/29
- Re: missing help2man, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/28
- Re: missing help2man,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: missing help2man, Roumen Petrov, 2008/11/28
- Re: missing help2man, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/11/29
- Re: missing help2man, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/27
- Re: missing help2man, Bob Proulx, 2008/11/27