[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
documentation bug about AM_MAINTAINER_MODE?
From: |
Daniel Kahn Gillmor |
Subject: |
documentation bug about AM_MAINTAINER_MODE? |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:54:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090103) |
hey good GNU folks--
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the autotools suite, so this may
very well not be a bug. Feel free to tell me if if i'm mixed up.
In the documentation for AM_MAINTAINER_MODE [0], it states:
> People use AM_MAINTAINER_MODE either because they do want their users
> (or themselves) annoyed by timestamps lossage (see CVS), or because they
> simply can't stand the rebuild rules and prefer running maintainer tools
> explicitly.
However, from my (limited) understanding, it seems like maintainer-mode
would *avoid* CVS-generated timestamp annoyances for these files.
So shouldn't the text read "...because they do *not* want their users
(or themselves) annoyed..."?
Or have i misunderstood the point entirely?
--dkg
[0]
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/automake.html.gz#maintainer_002dmode
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- documentation bug about AM_MAINTAINER_MODE?,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <=