Re: choosing the default for silent-rules

[Jim Meyering]

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 01:34:50PM CEST:
>> Switching to silent-rules feels like progress, so I want it to be
>> enabled by default, at least for packages I maintain.  Of course,
>> that's my judgment, and if enough people say that my enabling
>> silent-rules broke their XYZ, I can always change it back.
>
> I'm a bit undecided on the issue, with no great preference.  Thus I
> think I'll keep the argument to AM_SILENT_RULES undocumented for now
> and let users fight this out when it spreads.

Fine by me.
Silence ru13z!
;-)