[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --silent should work for install too
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: --silent should work for install too |
Date: |
Fri, 15 May 2009 20:08:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
[ adding bug-automake, please drop bug-libtool from replies ]
* Samuel Thibault wrote on Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:22:03AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues, le Thu 14 May 2009 20:27:23 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Ah, ok, thanks.
> > > Mmm, upgrading to 1.10.2 makes some of them disappear, but there are
> > > still some others, related to automake this time.
> >
> > Which ones, sample output please?
>
> Those produced by
>
> echo " $(includeHEADERS_INSTALL) '$$d$$p' '$(DESTDIR)$(includedir)/$$f'"; \
They are still noisy with current git Automake, even with silent-rules
mode enabled. However, we have improved installation to install several
files at once, so there will be fewer commands output (with albeit
longer lines though).
At this time, I don't think silent-rules should impact installation and
uninstallation output. I have no good reason for this choice. However,
I also wouldn't know what to output in a less verbose mode in a way that
would tell the user what happened, but be strictly less verbose; also,
as a cheap technical reason it would require more than the already
implemented framework. Maybe something like prefixing the rules with
echo installing to $(bindir)
exec >/dev/null
but that also seems quite ugly to me for more than one reason.
(Yes, I am mixing up abstract discussion of a useful feature with
specific limitations of current code and used tools above ... )
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: --silent should work for install too,
Ralf Wildenhues <=