[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#7635: AC_LIBSOURCE doesn't fail as it should if AC_OUTPUT is not use
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
bug#7635: AC_LIBSOURCE doesn't fail as it should if AC_OUTPUT is not used |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:11:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
tags 7635 wontfix
close 7635
thanks
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:35:32PM CET:
> If configure.ac does not contain a call to AC_OUTPUT, Automake
> does not fail as expected when file(s) specified in calls to
> macros AC_LIBSOURCE and/or AC_LIBSOURCES do not exist. See the
> attached test script.
>
> Now, while the lack of AC_OUTPUT in configure.ac is almost surely
> a user error, IMHO it shouldn't prevent Automake from warning about
> other errors (in this case, the non-existence of files specified in
> calls to macros AC_LIBSOURCE and AC_LIBSOURCES).
Sorry, but I think the mechanism is fully adequate for any real-life
situation: the developer will first see that configure won't produce
any files, fix that bug by adding AC_OUTPUT, then see the other
automake error. We don't need to ensure that all errors are
non-followup ones, that is impossible in practice.
I'm thus closing this bug as invalid.
Thanks for the report,
Ralf