[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8099: LaTeX and automake
From: |
Reuben Thomas |
Subject: |
bug#8099: LaTeX and automake |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:39:13 +0000 |
On 27 February 2011 14:42, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Well yes. Also, as you already mentioned, latex semantics don't really
> fit a directed graph where the nodes are files; rather, it needs a more
> complex diagram of states of sets of files. I don't think trying to map
> that to portable make would be a worthwhile endeavor, given that latexmk
> already exists. I think we should just try to find rules that are safe
> in the sense of: they call out to latexmk when needed, and not too often
> when it is not needed.
So I was thinking, latexmk could output a list of dependent files for
a given root file, and Make simply calls latexmk when any of them
changes.
> That could be an improvement. Or, as a first step, just calling latexmk
> every time. Does it do anything if files are up to date?
No, which is a good start!
> Do you happen to know if latexmk works with pgfplots?
It doesn't seem to know about it.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
- bug#8099: LaTeX and automake, Reuben Thomas, 2011/02/22
- bug#8099: LaTeX and automake, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/27
- bug#8099: LaTeX and automake, Reuben Thomas, 2011/02/27
- bug#8099: LaTeX and automake, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/27
- bug#8099: LaTeX and automake,
Reuben Thomas <=
- bug#8099: LaTeX and automake, Reuben Thomas, 2011/02/28
- bug#8099: LaTeX and automake, Reuben Thomas, 2011/02/28
- bug#8099: LaTeX and automake, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/02/28
- bug#8099: LaTeX and automake, Reuben Thomas, 2011/02/28