[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9026: Supporting $ACLOCAL_PATH?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
bug#9026: Supporting $ACLOCAL_PATH? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jul 2011 17:49:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110017 (No Gnus v0.17) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
On an FHS-style system, all macros are picked up from
/usr/share/aclocal. Conversely, on a Stow/Nix-style installation,
macros are to be found in /foo/automake/share/aclocal,
/bar/guile/share/aclocal, /baz/pkg-config/share/aclocal, etc.
It seems to me that the latter calls for user environment-specific
settings, which an $ACLOCAL_PATH environment variable would handily
support [0].
WDYT?
Bruno rightfully noted the importance of having a reproducible way of
producing tarballs, and user-specific environment settings appear to go
counter this goal. However, there will always be a need for this kind
of setting on Stow/Nix-style systems, AFAICS.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
[0] In fact Nixpkgs/NixOS has a wrapper around ‘aclocal’ that does
exactly this (see
<https://svn.nixos.org/repos/nix/nixpkgs/trunk/pkgs/development/tools/misc/automake/builder.sh>.)
- bug#9026: Supporting $ACLOCAL_PATH?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
bug#9026: Supporting $ACLOCAL_PATH?, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/07/08