[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#12877: Autoconf, GNU m4 and POSIXLY_CORRECT
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
bug#12877: Autoconf, GNU m4 and POSIXLY_CORRECT |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:50:57 +0100 |
On 11/14/2012 12:24 PM, Sebastian Freundt wrote:
> "Stefano Lattarini" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Yes, I will report this issue to the m4 guys.
> 1.9a has the -g switch and is newer than 1.4 anyway.
>
Oh, sorry, I has misread the version number as "1.4.9a" *blush*!
I agree a report to the m4 list might be a good move. But consider
that the 2.0 m4 release has been put in the back burner "until further
notice", so I'd still suggest you to only employ m4 versions in the
1.4.x series for the moment being; especially for any production use.
Regards,
Stefano
- bug#12877: automake error: unrequested trace '', Sebastian Freundt, 2012/11/13
- bug#12877: automake error: unrequested trace '', Stefano Lattarini, 2012/11/13
- bug#12877: automake error: unrequested trace '', Sebastian Freundt, 2012/11/14
- bug#12877: Autoconf, GNU m4 and POSIXLY_CORRECT (was: Re: bug#12877: automake error: unrequested trace ''), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/11/14
- bug#12877: Autoconf, GNU m4 and POSIXLY_CORRECT, Sebastian Freundt, 2012/11/14
- bug#12877: Autoconf, GNU m4 and POSIXLY_CORRECT, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/11/14
- bug#12877: Autoconf, GNU m4 and POSIXLY_CORRECT, Sebastian Freundt, 2012/11/14
- bug#12877: Autoconf, GNU m4 and POSIXLY_CORRECT,
Stefano Lattarini <=
- bug#12877: Autoconf, GNU m4 and POSIXLY_CORRECT, Eric Blake, 2012/11/14