[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#11524: ping on automake bug#11524
From: |
Dagobert Michelsen |
Subject: |
bug#11524: ping on automake bug#11524 |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:08:53 +0100 |
Hi Stefano,
Am 26.11.2012 um 12:44 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen <address@hidden>:
> Hi Stefano,
> Am 26.11.2012 um 12:38 schrieb Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden>:
>
>> On 11/22/2012 10:42 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>>> On 11/21/2012 10:17 PM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I still get quite some failures:
>>>> http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/~dam/automake-1.12.5-test-suite.log
>>>
>>>> FAIL: t/depcomp-lt-cpp
>>>> ======================
>>>>
>>>> depcomp-lt-cpp: running libtoolize --version
>>>> libtoolize (GNU libtool) 2.4.2
>>>> [SNIP]
>>>> + . depcomp.sh
>>>> +++ pwd
>>>> ++ ocwd=/home/dam/.../automake-1.12.5/t/depcomp-lt-cpp.dir
>>>> ++
>>>> longpath=this-is/a-path/which-has/quite-a/definitely/truly/long_long_name
>>>> ++ cachevar=am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type
>>>> [SNIP]
>>>> ++ displayed_depmode='(cached) cpp'
>>>> ++ cfg_deptrack=am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type=cpp
>>>> ++ /opt/csw/bin/ggrep -F am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type configure
>>>> if ${am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type+:} false; then :
>>>> am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type=none
>>>> am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type=$depmode
>>>> am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type=none
>>>> { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: result:
>>>> $am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type" >&5
>>>> $as_echo "$am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type" >&6; }
>>>> CCDEPMODE=depmode=$am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type
>>>> && test "$am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type" = gcc3; then
>>>> ++ cd_top
>>>> ++ cd /home/dam/.../automake-1.12.5/t/depcomp-lt-cpp.dir
>>>> [SNIP]
>>>> ++ mkdir intree
>>>> ++ cd intree
>>>> [SNIP]
>>>> ++ ./configure am_cv_CC_dependencies_compiler_type=cpp
>>>> configure: error: in
>>>> `/home/dam/mgar/pkg/automake/trunk/work/solaris10-sparc/build-isa-sparcv8plus-version-1.12.5/automake-1.12.5/t/depcomp-lt-cpp.dir/intree':
>>>> configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
>>>> See `config.log' for more details
>>>> ++ tap_result_='not ok'
>>>> ++ result_ 'not ok' -D '' -r '' -- '[in-tree build] configure'
>>>> ++ set +x
>>>> ++ cat stdout
>>>> checking for a BSD-compatible install... /opt/csw/bin/ginstall -c
>>>> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
>>>> checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /opt/csw/bin/gmkdir -p
>>>> checking for gawk... gawk
>>>> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
>>>> checking for gcc... gcc
>>>> checking whether the C compiler works... no
>>>> not ok 1 - [in-tree build] configure
>>>> FAIL: t/depcomp-lt-cpp.tap 1 - [in-tree build] configure
>>>>
>>> OK, this reeks of spurious failure.
>>>
>> A look to:
>>
>> <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/~dam/automake-1.12.5/t/depcomp-lt-gcc.dir/intree/config.log>
>>
>> seems to confirm this:
>>
>> ...
>> compilation terminated.
>> configure:2949: $? = 1
>> configure:2969: checking whether the C compiler works
>> configure:2991: gcc -I/opt/csw/include -m32 -xarch=sparc -L/opt/csw/lib
>> conftest.c >&5
>> gcc: error: language arch=sparc not recognized
>> gcc: error: language arch=sparc not recognized
>> configure:2995: $? = 1
>> configure:3033: result: no
>> configure: failed program was:
>> ...
>>
>> And according to
>>
>> <http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/~dam/automake-1.12.5/t/get-sysconf.log>
>>
>> You're passing flags specific to the Solaris C compiler in the LDFLAGS
>> variable;
>> that is, the "-xarch=sparc" in:
>>
>> LDFLAGS='-m32 -xarch=sparc -L/opt/csw/lib'
>>
>> Since LDFLAGS is used also by gcc, chaos ensues.
>
> Unfortunately this is necessary most of the time as the linker on Solaris is
> mostly invoked from the
> compiler when compiling with Sun Studio, especially for selecting 32/64.
> Nonetheless I can of course
> take out the flags and give it a try on a package-by-package basis and
> disable these for automake.
>
>> Could yo try to re-run the testsuite with a fixed environment, that is,
>> exporting flags specific to the Solaris compiler in CFLAGS rather than
>> in LDLFAGS?
>
> Sure, running now.
This looks *much* better now:
http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/~dam/automake-1.12.5-2012-11-26/
However, what I don't understand is that I especially select Sun Studio
compiler which
accepts the defined LDFLAGS. Why does automake try to test gcc stuff with the
flags?
I mean, if I set the compiler to gcc and pass gcc flags it would probably also
work.
Best regards
-- Dago
--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to
do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896
bug#11524: ping on automake bug#11524, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/11/22