[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:12:43 +0900 |
Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden> writes:
> So we should maybe go (after the next major release) with this naming
> scheme for the branches?
>
> * maint -> for next micro version
> * stable -> for next minor version
> * master -> for next major version
That seems to match common practice, insofar as I understand it...
[Another consideration is whether you have a single named branch for
maintenance (e.g. "maint", and "stable"), or just use version-named
branches (and thus can maintain multiple versions simultaneously).]
-miles
--
Future, n. That period of time in which our affairs prosper, our friends
are true and our happiness is assured.
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, (continued)
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/27
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/27
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/27
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/27
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/27
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/28
- Message not available
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/27
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues,
Miles Bader <=
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Russ Allbery, 2013/02/28
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/25
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Miles Bader, 2013/02/25
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/02/25
- bug#13578: [IMPORTANT] Savannah issues, Miles Bader, 2013/02/25