[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14126: dist_EXTRA_SCRIPTS
From: |
Дилян Палаузов |
Subject: |
bug#14126: dist_EXTRA_SCRIPTS |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Apr 2013 21:32:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 |
Hello,
As of Automake 1.13.1, in the documentaion, in node The Uniform Naming
Scheme, last paragraph:
Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that control other
aspects of `automake''s behavior. The currently defined prefixes are
`dist_', `nodist_', `nobase_', and `notrans_'. These prefixes are
explained later (*note Program and Library Variables::) (*note Man
Pages::).
is not written, which primaries allow additional prefixes, and which do
not allow.
Moreover, I got confused by EXTRA_ , dist_ and _SCRIPTS. "EXTRA_SCRIPTS
= file" is legal, as is "dist_EXTRA_SCRIPTS = file" . According to my
expectations, the last shall mean, that on "make dist" the latter
implies, that "file" is included in the tarball, but it isn't.
Eventually, I had to use dist_noinst_SCRIPTS.
Do I misread the documentation, that dist_EXTRA_SCRIPTS is wrong, or is
it not written?
Greetings
Дилян
- bug#14126: dist_EXTRA_SCRIPTS,
Дилян Палаузов <=