[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
bug#9088: Java, JARS primary? |
Date: |
Mon, 13 May 2013 20:17:06 +0200 |
Given all the rationales given by Russ and Micheal, I think we should
drop the idea of having "smart dependencies" for the moment being (I
suggested that because, in my ignorance of Java, I thought they would
be easy to implement).
Instead, let's start implementing something *correct*, in line with
the Java philosophy, and with a clean API. We'll think about enhancing
it when (and if!) the need arise.
Thanks,
Stefano
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/10
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Michael Zucchi, 2013/05/11
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Michael Zucchi, 2013/05/12
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/12
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Russ Allbery, 2013/05/12
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Michael Zucchi, 2013/05/13
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?,
Stefano Lattarini <=
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Michael Zucchi, 2013/05/15
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/15
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Michael Zucchi, 2013/05/15
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/16
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Michael Zucchi, 2013/05/16
- bug#9088: Java, JARS primary?, Stefano Lattarini, 2013/05/18
- bug#9088: the jar fragment, Michael Zucchi, 2013/05/17
- bug#9088: the jar fragment, Michael Zucchi, 2013/05/19