[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#23521: XFAIL
|
From: |
Gavin Smith |
|
Subject: |
bug#23521: XFAIL |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 May 2016 15:58:02 +0100 |
On 19 May 2016 at 00:04, Mathieu Lirzin <address@hidden> wrote:
>> It is often easier to write expected-to-fail tests this way (so that
>> they can all look the same), rather than have to have, for example, an
>> extra driver that converts expected errors into success codes for the
>> automake test harness.
>
> What do you mean precisely by “an extra driver”?
This would be a reference to a "custom test driver".
https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Overview-of-Custom-Test-Drivers-Support.html#Overview-of-Custom-Test-Drivers-Support