[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Sep 2021 09:28:50 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1229-g7ca81dfce5-fm-20210908.005-g7ca81dfc |
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, at 1:31 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
> One big problem with the Autotools as of today is that they promote
> the use of macros/build rules for Yacc, not for Bison.
The contract of AC_PROG_YACC is to find something that will generate
parsers from POSIX-compliant input; all three of bison, byacc, and
classic yacc are considered.
We would be happy to take contributions of AC_PROG_BISON (and
AC_PROG_FLEX), but as you know there isn’t anyone doing active
development of Autoconf right now, so it’s not going to happen without
someone stepping up.
zw
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, (continued)
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/08
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, Karl Berry, 2021/09/08
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, Paul Eggert, 2021/09/08
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/09
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/10
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, Sam James, 2021/09/10
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/11
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, Akim Demaille, 2021/09/11
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, Kiyoshi KANAZAWA, 2021/09/11
- bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake, Paul Eggert, 2021/09/11
bug#50469: [bison-3.8] bug or side effect to flex & automake,
Zack Weinberg <=
bug#50469:, Karl Berry, 2021/09/19